We are witness to the rise in the "information"
or "knowledge based" business. As companies and
industries have emerged based entirely on information and
knowledge, the legal community has increasingly been called
upon to find ways to protect that information. The courts
in Canada have responded by finding that information is "confidential
in nature", thus restricting the right to commercially
exploit. The
Province of Ontario has now enacted the Electronic Commerce
Act. The intent of the Act is to provide a coherent set of
rules when information in electronic form is exchanged. The
Act does not prescribe the use of technology, but rather provides
a set of rules when information is exchanged entirely in electronic
form.
The Act is enabling. If the parties do not consent to an electronic
agreement, then the Act does not apply. While it may be possible
to infer consent from the conduct of the parties, businesses
should be prepared for the argument that the consumer did
not consent to the electronic agreement.
The Act contains a limited error correction mechanism, which
is not present in its American counterparts. A transaction
between an individual and an electronic agent is voidable
if an important mistake is made and there is no opportunity
to amend or correct the error. Accordingly, businesses should
ensure that consumers are afforded ample opportunity to correct
potential mistakes.
The Act provides that the electronic format will be functionally
equivalent to an original document in many circumstances.
For example, the legal requirement for a signature will be
obviated by the use of an electronic signature. It is expected
that regulations will be made pursuant to the Act to prescribe
a specific set of rules governing the reliability of electronic
signatures. Similarly, the requirement to retain a document
can be satisfied if it is retained in its electronic form
if the accuracy and integrity of the original can be ensured.
This is another area where it is expected that regulations
will provide additional rules on how the integrity of the
information can be preserved.
The Act specifies rules for establishing when and where contracts
are deemed to be sent and received. An electronic document
is received when it is capable of being retrieved and processed
by the recipient. Actual receipt is not material. Businesses
operating from Ontario should be aware that the rules do not
necessary correspond in other jurisdictions, including the
United States of America. It is imperative, particularly in
the business to business context, that the parties address
contract formation and the proposed jurisdiction for enforcement.
In many respects, the Act is simply a recognition of the rapidly
evolving electronic marketplace. Businesses carrying on business
electronically must take note of the salient provisions of
the Act and where applicable, should amend their electronic
forms to bring themselves within the ambit of the Act.
|